The following is a paper by H. Aspden published in Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, v. 38, 423-426 (1983).

**Abstract**: Recent precision measurements of the proton-electron mass
ratio confirm a theoretical evaluation dating from 1975 to one part in
10^{7}. The theory suggests that this discrepancy, which measurements
show to be 0.833 +/- 0.436 parts in 10^{7}, may evidence a very small
inequality between the magnitudes of the proton charge and the electron charge,
theoretically predicted to be 1.07 parts in 10^{7}.

**Commentary**: The reader should here understand that the author was
conscious of the fact that his theory assigned a finite spherical form to the
electron, which needed to have a very much larger radius than the proton. If,
therefore, the aether is a kind of charge plenum or continuum neutralized by
unitary lattice charges e, all having the same polarity in our local space
domain, there has to be a minute discrepancy of effective charge owing to the
continuum displaced by the presence of the electron. This was not assumption,
inasmuch as the very explanation for gravitation advanced by the author in the
1960s relied upon such a charge discrepancy, as seated in the microcosm of space
occupied by the graviton. The problem, however, is that, in explaining very
minor discrepancies at this part in ten million level of activity, one can be
drawn into a realm of speculation which may detract from the quality of the
primary work. It is hoped that the reader will preserve a measure of
circumspection at this level of enquiry, until more is known experimentally that
can confirm what is suggested.

Note here that the issue is whether the electron charge and the proton charge
have equal magnitudes at this part in ten million level. We now know that a
proton and an antiproton have equal mass (and so presumably equal charge)
magnitude, with agreement to within 1 part in 10^{8} [Physics World,
*'Antihydrogen'* pp. 44-48 (July 1993)]. This, however, can apply, because
the proton space-occupancy volume is so small. If, however, the electron and
positron charges are compared, on the theory of the part in ten million
discrepancy of the subject paper, we should expect a two part in ten million
charge discrepancy. In terms of an electron spin anomaly this would translate
into a g-factor discrepancy between positron and electron somewhat larger than
the one actually measured. However, the overriding effect of secondary wave
resonance effects could well normalize the actions measured and make them
equal.